United States Patent and Trademark Office
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
United States Pateot and Trademark Office
Address: COMMISSIONER FOR PATENTS
P.O. Box 1450
Alexandria, Virginia 22313-1450
www.uspto.gov
APPLICATION NO.
FILING DATE
FIRST NAMED INVENTOR
ATTORNEY DOCKET NO.
CONFIRMATION NO.
09/725,849
11/30/2000
Jong Jin Park
2658-0252?
8778
2292 7590 03/25/2004
BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH
PO BOX 747
FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747
EXAMINER
AWAD, AMR A
ART UNIT
PAPER NUMBER
2675
DATE MAILED: 03/25/2004
Please find below and/or attached an Office communication concerning this application or proceeding.
PTO-90C (Rev. 10/03)
Advisory Action
Application No.
09/725,849
Examiner
Amr Awad
Applicant(s)
PARK ET AL.
Art Unit
2675
-The MAILING DATE of this communication appears on the cover sheet with the correspondence address
THE REPLY FILED 16 March 2004 FAILS TO PLACE THIS APPLICATION IN CONDITION FOR ALLOWANCE.
Therefore, further action by the applicant is required to avoid abandonment of this application. A proper reply to a
final rejection under 37 CFR 1 . 1 1 3 may only be either: (1 ) a timely filed amendment which places the application in
condition for allowance; (2) a timely filed Notice of Appeal (with appeal fee); or (3) a timely filed Request for Continued
Examination (RCE) in compliance with 37 CFR 1,114.
PERIOD FOR REPLY [check either a) or b)]
a) S The period for reply expires 3_months from the mailing date of the final rejection.
b) n The period for reply expires on: (1) the mailing date of this Advisory Action, or (2) the date set forth in the final rejection, whichever is later. In
no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of the final rejection.
ONLY CHECK THIS BOX WHEN THE FIRST REPLY WAS FILED WITHIN TWO MONTHS OF THE FINAL REJECTION. See MPEP
706.07(f).
Extensions of time may be obtained under 37 CFR 1.136(a). The date on which the petition under 37 CFR 1.136(a) and the appropriate extension
fee have been filed is the date for purposes of determining the period of extension and the coresponding amount of the fee. The appropriate extension
fee under 37 CFR 1.17(a) is calculated from: (1) the expiration date of the shortened statutory period for reply originally set in the final Office action; or
(2) as set forth in (b) above, if checked. Any reply received by the Office later than three months after the mailing date of the final rejection, even if
timely filed, may reduce any earned patent term adjustment. See 37 CFR 1.704(b).
1 .□ A Notice of Appeal was filed on . Appellant's Brief must be filed within the period set forth in
37 CFR 1 .192(a), or any extension thereof (37 CFR 1 .191(d)), to avoid dismissal of the appeal.
20 The proposed amendment(s) will not be entered because:
(a) □ they raise new issues that would require further consideration and/or search (see NOTE below);
(b) □ they raise the issue of new matter (see Note below);
(c) □ they are not deemed to place the application in better form for appeal by materially reducing or simplifying the
issues for appeal; and/or
(d) □ they present additional claims without canceling a corresponding number of finally rejected claims.
NOTE: .
3.n Applicant's reply has overcome the following rejection(s): .
4. n Newly proposed or amended claim(s) would be allowable if submitted in a separate, timely filed amendment
canceling the non-allowable claim(s).
5. ^ The a)n affidavit, b)n exhibit, or c)S request for reconsideration has been considered but does NOT place the
application in condition for allowance because: See Continuation Sheet .
6. n The affidavit or exhibit will NOT be considered because it is not directed SOLELY to issues which were newly
raised by the Examiner in the final rejection.
7. ^ For purposes of Appeal, the proposed amendment(s) a)n will not be entered or b)^ will be entered and an
explanation of how the new or amended claims would be rejected is provided below or appended.
The status of the claim(s) is (or will be) as follows:
Claim(s) allowed: 9 and 10 ,
Claim(s) objected to: .
Claim(s) rejected: 1-8. 11-14.16.18,20-21 ,
Claim(s) withdrawn from consideration: .
8. n The drawing correction filed on is a)n approved or b)n disapproved by the Examiner.
9. n Note the attached Information Disclosure Statement(s)( PTO-1449) Paper No(s). .
10. D Other:
3 ,2L3'^^^
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
PTOL-303 (Rev. 11-03)
Advisory Action
Part of Paper No. 9
Gont^u^ion Sheet (PTOL-303)
Application No. 09/725,849
Continuation of 5. does NOT place the application in condition for allowance because: Applicant's argument is not persuasive. Applicant
argued that Takahashi discloses applying a first selecting voltage in a predetermined period of the first horizontal period in a
predetermined period of the first horizontal period in one frame and applying a second selecting voltage in the second half of the first
horizontal period in next frame, which is different from the claimed limitation of applying a second signal during an ending of the same
frame. Examiner respectfully disagrees. It is clear from figures 8A-8D that the reference shows the two signal within the same frame.
2